> Before I email Karsten several additional packs
>
> cs_INN_de_CA.zip
> cs_INN_en_CA.zip
> cs_INN_fr_CA.zip
> cs_en_US.zip
>
> I wanted to ask about data pack naming which is presently
>
> 2011-09-tallman
> ca-2011-non-brand-drug-info
>
> … I can se advantages to instead group together related kinds of data
> packs by naming the start of the pack with the group to which the pack
> belongs, for example
>
> drug-names
> diag-code
> lab-codes
>
> under which convention we might rename the existing as
>
> drug-names-tallman-2011-09
> drug-names-substance-info-en_CA
>
> and the additional ones:
>
> drug-names-substance-info-en_US
> drug-names-substance-info-INN-en
> drug-names-substance-info-INN-fr
> drug-names-substance-info-INN-de
>
> BTW the INN packs include the subset of 4251 substances (derived from
> among the 6354 dosing ranges available in Canada) for which there were INNs
> available to be harvested and which also have ATC codes. The US pack, although
> it has 6940 records, does not supply ATCs hence my not bothering to see
> whether to derive from American instead of Canadian would generate any more
> INN records.
>
> -- Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnumed-devel mailing list
>
address@hidden
>
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel