[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Improving FCFS daemon
From: |
Schanzenbach, Martin |
Subject: |
Re: Improving FCFS daemon |
Date: |
Sun, 16 May 2021 09:26:37 +0000 |
We may also think about if the FCFS service falls under the authority of GANA.
Alessio made a good point wrt hidden names which would mean that we do not
want to put all registered names in GANA anyway, but the handling of FCFS and
its policy could be defined there.
BR
> On 16. May 2021, at 10:00, Christian Grothoff <grothoff@gnunet.org> wrote:
>
> On 5/15/21 10:19 PM, Alessio Vanni wrote:
>> I'll add a section in the handbook after fixing the crash.
>> Should it be added as a subsection of NAMESTORE? I'm not really sure
>> where it would be more appropriate, but since at a source level it's in
>> the same directory, that seems to be a possible candidate.
>
> I'd have put it under GNU Name System into a separate section. But,
> NAMESTORE is also not wrong.
>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
- Improving FCFS daemon, Alessio Vanni, 2021/05/15
- Re: Improving FCFS daemon, Alessio Vanni, 2021/05/16
- Re: Improving FCFS daemon, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2021/05/17
- Re: Improving FCFS daemon, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2021/05/17
- Re: Improving FCFS daemon, Alessio Vanni, 2021/05/19
Re: Improving FCFS daemon, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2021/05/15