[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: how essential is ffcall ?
From: |
Dennis Leeuw |
Subject: |
Re: how essential is ffcall ? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jun 2001 09:07:59 +0200 |
Adam Fedor wrote:
> "Robert E. Hartley" wrote:
> >
> > > How essential is ffcall stuff?
> >
>
> It's used for Invocations and Distributed Objects, which is not
> important for most applications, but it does affect things like Drag and
> Drop, communication with other apps (like the workspace), etc. If you
> don't have it, the default mframe code may or may not work or may
> partially work on your system.
>
> > Is it the same as, or it superceded by the libffi code in GCC v3.0?
> >
>
> libffi is similar, although at the time I wrote the ffcall support,
> libffi didn't support closures on anything except ix86 platforms. Now I
> think it supports more systems, but I haven't looked at it much. You'd
> have to write something similar to the ffcall support that is currently
> in base (see GSFFCallInvocation class, for example).
Is the GSFFIInvocation.m currently available very outdated ?
And when I use libffi from gcc 3.0 what is the way to test if everything
works alright ?
I saw in the changelog of libffi that there is some arm support...
Would be nice to test if it works, just for fun.
Dennis
dleeuw.vcf
Description: Card for Dennis Leeuw
- Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Richard Frith-Macdonald, 2001/06/05
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Nicola Pero, 2001/06/05
- how essential is ffcall ?, Robert E. Hartley, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Robert E. Hartley, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Adam Fedor, 2001/06/05
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?,
Dennis Leeuw <=
- Re: how essential is ffcall ?, Adam Fedor, 2001/06/08
Re: Disabling inline in mframe.m, Richard Stallman, 2001/06/05