Re: Arch support on Savannah

[Adam Fedor]

On Dec 10, 2005, at 5:49 PM, Quentin Mathé wrote:
> I suppose by 'Savannah' the second time, you mean 'Subversion' in fact ? 
>
> I think Subversion would be a better choice, because Arch is  
> complicated to use imho. Arch would be a way more radical move than  
> cvs to svn. However I would prefer moving to Arch than sticking with  
> cvs. 
Yes, my mistake.  Keep your hopes up :-)