[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NSSound
From: |
Xavier Glattard |
Subject: |
Re: NSSound |
Date: |
Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:45:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707) |
Stefan Bidigaray a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Xavier Glattard
<address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
24-bits audio becomes very common.
What i mean is that most (all?) sound cards are now 24-bits / 96kHz.
Even the old Audigy can do that.
(...)
A GSSoundKit might be the right place for it.
http://www.cilinder.be/docs/next/NeXTStep/3.3/nd/
http://www.musickit.org/
I would really like to go into something like this, I'm actually trying
my best to write NSSound in a way that this can be more easily accomplished.
I agree ;)
That why I think you should Keep It Simple.
On debian lenny i386 libsndfile.so is less than 360Kio while
libgnustep-gui.so is near 4Mio.
If you think it is realy important, what about a reduced libsndfile
? One may probably build sndfile with a reduced set of codecs (the
LGPL ones).
I mean here that a reduced libsndfile might be included in your code,
that will be updated along with the official libsndfile. You would not
have to write a fallback NSSound. At least on an audio-capable system.
But it might be easier to write your own code - 'dunno.
Did you check portaudio ? (just fall on it) It is damn' small! (44Kio)
Regards,
- Xavier
- Re: NSSound, (continued)
- NSSound, Stefan Bidigaray, 2009/06/03
- Re: NSSound, David Chisnall, 2009/06/04
- Re: NSSound, Fred Kiefer, 2009/06/04
- Re: NSSound, Xavier Glattard, 2009/06/05
- Re: NSSound, Stefan Bidigaray, 2009/06/05
- Re: NSSound,
Xavier Glattard <=
- Re: NSSound, Stefan Bidigaray, 2009/06/05
- Re: NSSound, David Chisnall, 2009/06/05
- Re: NSSound, Stefan Bidigaray, 2009/06/05
- Re: NSSound, David Chisnall, 2009/06/05