[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NSSound
From: |
David Chisnall |
Subject: |
Re: NSSound |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:53:00 +0100 |
On 5 Jun 2009, at 16:45, Xavier Glattard wrote:
Stefan Bidigaray a écrit :
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Xavier Glattard <address@hidden
<mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:
24-bits audio becomes very common.
What i mean is that most (all?) sound cards are now 24-bits / 96kHz.
Even the old Audigy can do that.
I didn't reply to this earlier, but I think NSSound should be very
wary of making any assumptions about the native sound format for the
hardware for several reasons:
1) Expensive hardware now uses floating-point samples internally, and
this is likely to become the case for cheap hardware in the future.
2) Handheld devices and telephony systems often use lower quality
sound (even 8-bit or 22KHz) for speaker output.
3) A lot of sound hardware can do format conversion in the DSP, which
uses less power than doing it on the CPU and doesn't take CPU time
from other programs.
4) Any half-decent OS hides these details from you.
David
- NSSound, (continued)
- NSSound, Stefan Bidigaray, 2009/06/03
- Re: NSSound, David Chisnall, 2009/06/04
- Re: NSSound, Fred Kiefer, 2009/06/04
- Re: NSSound, Xavier Glattard, 2009/06/05
- Re: NSSound, Stefan Bidigaray, 2009/06/05
- Re: NSSound, Xavier Glattard, 2009/06/05
- Re: NSSound, Stefan Bidigaray, 2009/06/05
- Re: NSSound,
David Chisnall <=
- Re: NSSound, Stefan Bidigaray, 2009/06/05
- Re: NSSound, David Chisnall, 2009/06/05