Re: Proposal: new name: pbxbuild -> pearbuild

[Gregory Casamento]

ah! cool, then. :)

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:26 PM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> 2009/11/19 Gregory Casamento <address@hidden>:
>>
>> Hans,
>>
>> The only thing I'm wondering is why "pear" in particular?   I think
>> it's good, because it's imaginative.  Additionally, I wouldn't have
>> wanted the tool to be called gsxcodebuild or gspbxbuild or even
>> gsbuild as I have a distinct allergy to things being prefixed with GS
>> simply because they can be.   Part of this comes from having committed
>> the sin myself in the form of my "gopen" tool. :)   The only reason
>> it's not "open" is because there is an open keyword/tool on most
>> versions of Linux with which it would conflict. O_o
>
> pearbuild because it builds apple software but in an non-apple environment,
> and there is a bit of impedance mismatch here.
> And because the prefix still would be PB.



-- 
Gregory Casamento
Open Logic Corporation, Principal Consultant
## GNUstep Chief Maintainer
yahoo/skype: greg_casamento, aol: gjcasa
(240)274-9630 (Cell), (301)362-9640 (Home)