[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gpsd-dev] Are we in good shape for a 3.11 release tomorrow?
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
[gpsd-dev] Are we in good shape for a 3.11 release tomorrow? |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:30:06 -0500 (EST) |
Gary, what's the status of PPS for you? Has it stabilized on behavior
we can ship?
The mess around chrpath now seems resolved. Judicious deployment of
LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings in regress-driver and the scons library has
made embedding $PWD in RPATH unnecessary for people running the
standard regression tests; only ad-hoc tests (e.g. running gpsd or
gpsmon by hand) are a problem now. Accordingly, I have changed the
configuration default to chrpath=no and removed it from the dependency
list.
The multiple-options-in-LINKFLAGS things seems resolved as well.
I have gotten nowhere on Bernd's request for out-of-directory testing.
There's been too much else to do, and I don't feel like I have a
really firm grasp on his requirements. Next release, maybe.
Bernd ran some tests on the porterboxes; there are a few warnings and
minor problems but we seem basically OK there.
The build still defaults to doing leap-second fetching, but I've put
in code that exploits knowledge about when the IERS declares leap
seconds to cut the frequency way down - as in, it will only try the
fetch once per six months now. (Yes, I know that three-month intervals
are theoretically possible.)
Assuming we can ship tomorrow, I think we'll be looking at another
relatively short development cycle, with the major theme being
time autonomy.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
See, when the GOVERNMENT spends money, it creates jobs; whereas when the money
is left in the hands of TAXPAYERS, God only knows what they do with it. Bake
it into pies, probably. Anything to avoid creating jobs. -- Dave Barry
- [gpsd-dev] Are we in good shape for a 3.11 release tomorrow?,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- [gpsd-dev] RPATH tangle, Hal Murray, 2013/12/01