gpsd-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: would it be time to replace scons with meson build system?


From: Michael J. Tubby B.Sc. MIET
Subject: Re: would it be time to replace scons with meson build system?
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 23:14:23 +0000
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.2

Can we not just

./configure
make
make install


simplez ?

Mike ;-)



On 05/02/2020 23:09, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:

On 2/5/20 11:55 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Bernd Zeimetz <address@hidden>:
Imho the only useful alternative is cmake. Or meson, if you really think so.
Both two-phase systems.  Why do people keep building these things?
It's a bad idea that never gets better noo matter how often it's
repeated.
You are wrong. Really. Just plain wrong. Using well known tools that are
known to be able to build complex systems (and I'm not talking about the
code you are writing, way too tiny) saves so many hours of work as
people know how to use them.
Also every build system will have to implement the same functions as
make has proven to have since years, there is absolutely no issue in
generating code automatically. People even generate real program code
because it is easier and safe to generate it automatically. Nothing
wrong here.

And it absolutely doesn't matter if a program does wrong things or it
produces wrong code that instructs make to do wrong things, the result
is the same. One could even wrap autotools, libtool and make into a
single binary, it would be broken as before, but you would never see the
Makefile. It really doesn't make a difference.



--

Michael J Tubby B.Sc. (Hons) MIET / Technical Director
Email: address@hidden
Direct: +44 (0)1905 752892
Mobile: +44 (0)7973 225144

Thorcom Systems Limited
Office: +44 (0)1905 756 700
Unit 4, 96B Blackpole Trading Estate West, Worcester, WR3 8TJ, England, UK
Registered in England & Wales 02704696 / VAT Number GB487925681

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential or legally privileged and are intended solely the individual to whom it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must not take any action based upon its contents or disclose its contents to any third-party.
This email footer is intended to identify the sender and does not constitute a signature or agreement to enter into any form of legally binding contract.
While the author has taken reasonable care in the preparation of this email Errors and Omissions Excepted (E&OE).
Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Thorcom Systems Limited.
Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]