[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Nov 2001 20:05:57 +0100 (CET) |
> It's the worst mainstream thing to come out of the otherwise
> excellent GNU camp IMHO.
Please explain why do you think that texinfo is bad.
> Having groff's documentation solely in groff would be an excellent
> showcase of its abilities too.
Maybe, given that groff now supports HTML output. Remember that I
haven't started groff.texinfo (it was Trent Fisher), only extended
it. Improving and extending an existing command is much easier than
writing something from scratch.
Werner
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Larry Kollar, 2001/11/02
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/01
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/02
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/03
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, T. Kurt Bond, 2001/11/04
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/06
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, T. Kurt Bond, 2001/11/07
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/07
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info,
Werner LEMBERG <=
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Ted Harding, 2001/11/01