[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Nov 2001 23:18:44 +0100 (CET) |
> > Usually, the DocBook file is used to create various output
> > formats, so it is not unlikely that someone produces troff output
> > from DocBook. And that is perverse IMHO.
>
> Why? DocBook is a structural markup language for documentation; it
> does *not* specify the appearance of a document. Troff is a
> typesetting language; it is all about specifying the appearance of a
> document. Why would it be perverse to transform from structural
> markup into a typesetting language for output?
A misunderstanding. Assume that you prepare a typographically good
looking document in groff. Then you use a hypothetical grodocbook
output device to produce SGML. Finally, a user converts DocBook back
to groff for printing.
Werner
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Larry Kollar, 2001/11/02
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/01
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/02
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/03
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, T. Kurt Bond, 2001/11/04
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, T. Kurt Bond, 2001/11/07
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/07
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01