[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Nov 2001 02:42:05 +0100 (CET) |
> > I think it would be more effective to invest time into a modern
> > macro package (similar to LaTeX 2e) which is something really
> > needed IMHO.
>
> If you want LaTex, you know where to get it. Please don't inflict
> it on the rest of us.
Perhaps a misunderstanding. I don't want a LaTeX clone, I meant a
macro package of similar quality. For example, support for fonts is
rather poor in virtually any macro package for groff. Taking some
ideas from LaTeX's NFSS might be a good thing.
Werner
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, (continued)
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/02
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/03
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/04
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info groxml, Gaius Mulley, 2001/11/05
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info groxml, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/11/05
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Stewart C. Russell, 2001/11/01
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Larry Kollar, 2001/11/02
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/01
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/02
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/03
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, T. Kurt Bond, 2001/11/04
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/06
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, T. Kurt Bond, 2001/11/07
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/07
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01