[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Nov 2001 10:55:14 +0000 |
Hi Stewart,
> > Having groff's documentation solely in groff would be an excellent
> > showcase of its abilities too.
>
> better yet, hold it in DocBook and have it transformable into groff
> -- or whatever format you could want.
But it would remove one of the advantages, that of having a large,
idiomatic, not mechanically produced, work of groff included in the
distribution.
Also, I'd guess it would be easier to write examples of groff and the
matching output in groff.
Cheers,
Ralph.
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Christoph Kaegi, 2001/11/01
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/11/01
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/01
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/02
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/03
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/04
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info groxml, Gaius Mulley, 2001/11/05
- Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info groxml, Ralph Corderoy, 2001/11/05
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Stewart C. Russell, 2001/11/01
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Larry Kollar, 2001/11/02
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/01
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/01
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Bernd Warken, 2001/11/02
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/03
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, T. Kurt Bond, 2001/11/04
Re: [Groff] troff(1) and info, Werner LEMBERG, 2001/11/06