Re: [Groff] me docs

[Werner LEMBERG]

> > I've found a disadvantage: What if the user wants to use a
> > different implementation of the me macro package?  For example,
> > I've heard that the UNIX mm macros are still better than groff's
> > version.  I can imagine that people rename one of the packages to
> > have both available.  This avoids fiddling with the -M option.
> 
> Namespaces could handle this situation.

???  How does this help?  The interface is the same.


    Werner