[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms
From: |
Douglas McIlroy |
Subject: |
[TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jun 2023 22:18:08 -0400 |
I am not convinced that using special characters rather than in-line
eqn is a good thing. It means learning a whole new vocabulary. Quick,
what's the special character for Greek psi?
I have found that, for a sequence of displayed equations as in an
algebraic derivation, a pile often looks more coherent than a sequence
of EQ-EN pairs. The pile can even contain interleaved comments, as in
Hoare-style proofs.
Doug
- [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms,
Douglas McIlroy <=
- Re: [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/06/15
- Re: [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms, Damian McGuckin, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] end-S/long-S (was: Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms), markus schnalke, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: end-S/long-S (was: Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms), Paul Winalski, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: end-S/long-S (was: Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms), Damian McGuckin, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] GNU eqn clarifications and reforms, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: end-S/long-S (was: Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms), John Cowan, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: end-S/long-S (was: Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms), Steve Nickolas, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms, Robert Goulding, 2023/06/16