[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms
From: |
Robert Goulding |
Subject: |
Re: [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jun 2023 09:31:28 -0400 |
Many years ago,as a graduate student in the history of science, I read an
early-modern medical text that dealt with the method of "ſucking on ſores,"
which caused me chortle out loud in the British Library....
Robert Goulding
Sent from my phone
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023, 1:07 AM G. Branden Robinson <
g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> wrote:
> At 2023-06-16T14:22:22+1000, Damian McGuckin wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Jun 2023, G. Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > But I may suffer from an excessive familiarity with this material.
> >
> > Yes. Me too. Maybe that is a sad comment on the both of us.
>
> That is the price of trying to leave things better than one found them.
>
> > Why do Greeks have an alternate way of writing sigma!
>
> We English-speakers used to have an alternative way of writing it, if
> you regard the Latin alphabet's "S" as cognate (so to speak) with the
> Greek sigma (and I think doing so is defensible). It's even in Unicode
> with a low code point, U+017F.
>
> For inſtance, the United States uſed to employ a non-final lowercaſe S
> in the founding documents of its preſent government, where you can see
> exhibits of the "Congreſs of the United States".
>
> It can take the modern reader a "long S" time to not read that "s" as an
> "f".
>
> And if you think that's difficult enough, check out, IIRC, the Arabic
> and Devanagari scripts where you can have different initial, medial, and
> final forms for letters.
>
> Follow-ups ſhould probably be confined to groff@; I'll ſtop now leſt we
> get ſent to the COFF liſt for groſs tranſgreſſions of topicality.
>
> (Although if anyone wants to tell me whether non-final s was applied to
> the trailing ends of non-final morphemes _within_ words, I'm all ears.)
>
> Regards,
> Branden
>
- [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms, Douglas McIlroy, 2023/06/15
- Re: [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/06/15
- Re: [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms, Damian McGuckin, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] end-S/long-S (was: Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms), markus schnalke, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: end-S/long-S (was: Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms), Paul Winalski, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: end-S/long-S (was: Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms), Damian McGuckin, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] GNU eqn clarifications and reforms, G. Branden Robinson, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: end-S/long-S (was: Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms), John Cowan, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: end-S/long-S (was: Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms), Steve Nickolas, 2023/06/16
- Re: [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms,
Robert Goulding <=
Re: [TUHS] Re: GNU eqn clarifications and reforms, Damian McGuckin, 2023/06/16