[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eliminating grub_size_t
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: Eliminating grub_size_t |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:51:48 -0400 |
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 20:46 +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> If reiserfs is using it in wrong place, fix the reiserfs. If you are
> reading some file system variable, then you should use grub_uintN_t to
> specify storage size in bits.
OK, I'll have another look at the code.
> size_t is usually used as common index or offset (or size) to some
> buffer. size_t is returned by sizeof(). It is meant to be optimal size
> for platform. Eg. on 64bit memory bus it is 64bit and on 32bit memory
> bus it is 32bit. What grub is doing here is just defining yet another
> type for the same thing.
>
> Google for size_t if you want to find out more about it.
I know what it is. I believe int should be as good as size_t for most
purposes is we are not working with very large structures or read
gigabytes of data from files at once.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- Eliminating grub_size_t, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/01
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t, Javier Martín, 2008/07/01
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/02
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/07/02
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t,
Pavel Roskin <=
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t, Marco Gerards, 2008/07/03
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/03
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/07/03
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/03
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/07/03
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/03
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t, Marco Gerards, 2008/07/03
- Re: Eliminating grub_size_t, Pavel Roskin, 2008/07/03