Re: Eliminating grub_size_t

[Pavel Roskin]

On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 20:02 +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> > I know what it is.  I believe int should be as good as size_t for most
> > purposes is we are not working with very large structures or read
> > gigabytes of data from files at once.
> 
> Perhaps, but it doesn't hurt either.  I think it is a good thing to
> have a type such that it is clear what kind of variable is used.

I mean, we can have the type, but make it 32-bit on all systems.
Anyway, the warnings have been fixed.  In some cases, grub_size_t was
used for offsets, which is wrong because we want to support large files
on 32-bit systems.

I think I'll try to make grub_size_t 32-bit everywhere and see if it's
going to make any difference or help discover some issues.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin