Re: Eliminating grub_size_t

[Vesa Jääskeläinen]

Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 21:42 +0300, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
>
> > > I think I'll try to make grub_size_t 32-bit everywhere and see if it's
> > > going to make any difference or help discover some issues.
> > Why? I would let it be optimal type for current memory bus width.
>
> int is supposed to be the optimal type, and int is 32-bit on 64-bit
> platforms we support.  As far as I know, the x86_64 machine code
> actually defaults to 32-bit for all arguments except memory addresses.

And size_t is kinda connected to memory addresses. Do you agree :) ?