Re: [PATCH] Misc patches for grub2

[Bean]

Hi,

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Pavel Roskin <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > IMHO that even worse.  Using a trademarked name like "linux" to run the
>> > trademarked software could be justified.  But using a trademarked name
>> > to replace or emulate the original software is asking for a big trouble.
>> >
>> > Admittedly, I'm not a lawyer, but some people are, and it's better not
>> > to attract their attention.
>>
>> In fact, it doesn't replace bootcamp, it calls the service provided by
>> bootcamp. But anyway, it's not a big deal, I can just keep the name
>> appleloader.
>
> Fine.

I'm sorry, do you mean it's fine to use bootcamp, or keep the name appleloader ?

>
>> BTW, any comment about the other changes ?
>
> Why do we need "crc"?  If there are chances that it will be used for
> security, we should be using SHA-1.

crc is useful in many place. For example, png, jffs2, etc.

-- 
Bean