[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] terminal split
From: |
Colin D Bennett |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] terminal split |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Nov 2008 11:49:58 -0800 |
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008 20:12:56 +0100
Robert Millan <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:53:22PM +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote:
> >
> > I think multipath would be nice feature. Eg. you can have
> > serial/other remote connected and then have local terminal at same
> > time.
>
> In fact we need that if we ever want to support reading from AT
> keyboards and USB keyboards at the same time (we don't know which one
> is there, so whenever using hardware access for one of them, we need
> to try both).
Good point. Don't forget that machines may have multiple USB keyboards
attached, as well. I have used multi-keyboard, multi-mouse machines
before in a pair programming environment. (This does not necessarily
promote good pair programming practices, however.)
Regards,
Colin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [PATCH] terminal split, (continued)
Re: [PATCH] terminal split, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] terminal split, Robert Millan, 2008/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] terminal split,
Colin D Bennett <=
- [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Robert Millan, 2008/11/07
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/11/22
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Robert Millan, 2008/11/22
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/11/25
- Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Amin Azez, 2008/11/26
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Robert Millan, 2008/11/28
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/11/29