[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split)
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
[RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split) |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:26:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 08:12:56PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> - Turn the grub_cur_term_{input,output} pointers into lists, so that
> multiple terminals can be "current" at the same time.
>
> - Implement a "magic" input (or output) terminal that can be attached to
> other terminals and reads from (or writes to) more than one of them.
> The advantage of this is that the code doesn't have to be in kernel.
Or a third option, which derives from the second one:
- Move the whole terminal selection code away from kernel, into a module
(e.g. terminal.mod) that manages multiple terminals, and can possibly
enable them simultaneously.
This basicaly would mean:
- There's always a "default" terminal that is built into kernel already.
Before terminal.mod is loaded, the kernel would map generic terminal
functions (grub_getkey(), etc) to this terminal (e.g. using a single
grub_term_{input,output} couple of pointers).
- When loading terminal.mod, it hooks itself by replacing those two
pointers, and implements the whole register / unregister / iterate
enchilada.
- Some special casing would be needed so that the in-kernel terminals
can be part of terminal.mod's scheme.
What I like in this option is that it moves complexity (and code) away from
kernel without removing any functionality from it.
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
Re: [PATCH] terminal split, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] terminal split, Robert Millan, 2008/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] terminal split, Colin D Bennett, 2008/11/04
- [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split),
Robert Millan <=
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/11/22
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Robert Millan, 2008/11/22
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/11/25
- Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Amin Azez, 2008/11/26
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Robert Millan, 2008/11/28
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/11/29