[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] terminal split
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] terminal split |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Nov 2008 20:07:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 06:20:57PM +0100, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
>
> Also, a similar technique can be used to implement "getting an output as a
> string". For example:
>
> # Use the same password as the super user.
> set password=$(sed -ne '/^root:/{s/root:\([^:]*\).*/\1/;p}' /etc/shadow)
This would work much better in grub-mkconfig. You don't want to implement
(or port) sed do you? ;-)
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
Re: [PATCH] terminal split, Vesa Jääskeläinen, 2008/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] terminal split, Robert Millan, 2008/11/04
- Re: [PATCH] terminal split, Colin D Bennett, 2008/11/04
- [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Robert Millan, 2008/11/07
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/11/22
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Robert Millan, 2008/11/22
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2008/11/25
- Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Amin Azez, 2008/11/26
- Re: [RFC] Multi-terminal support (Re: [PATCH] terminal split), Robert Millan, 2008/11/28