Re: Status update on 1.0

[Ludovic Courtès]

Pierre Neidhardt <address@hidden> skribis:

> Danny Milosavljevic <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Or find out why on earth KMSCON needs the prorietary amdgpu kernel module.
>>
>> It's not exactly 3D graphics, so what is going on?  Furthermore, vesafb 
>> should
>> always work regardless (if slowly, but who cares).
>
> Simply because modern AMD cards don't support KMS without the
> proprietary kernel module (yet).

They should still support VESA, no?

Mathieu, any idea?  Do you think we could detect it when kmscon fails?
Or simply avoid it?

Ludo’.