[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :)
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :) |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Mar 2019 12:21:18 +0100 |
swedebugia <address@hidden> writes:
> Arch seems to have this and it is used in the gui tools like pamac but not on
> the command line.
> We could solve this by adding a new optional field to the package record
> (pretty-name "Armagetron Advanced")
Does it? I could not find a mention of this in the PKGBUILD article:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#pkgname
> For the packages that lack this field I would in the gui display them like
> this:
> (name "aircrack-ng") -> Aircrack-ng
Actually more like
(name "aircrack-ng") -> Aircrack Ng
since hyphens are added by us. In this specific example, it does not do
the right thing.
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :), (continued)
- Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :), Dan Frumin, 2019/03/17
- Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :), swedebugia, 2019/03/17
- Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :), Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/03/17
- Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :), Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/03/18
- Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :), Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/03/18
- Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :), swedebugia, 2019/03/19
- Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :),
Pierre Neidhardt <=
- Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :), Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/03/26
- Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :), swedebugia, 2019/03/29
Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :), Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/03/17
Re: Libre games that might be worth packaging :), Kei Kebreau, 2019/03/18