Re: 06/15: gnu: wesnoth-server: Rename package to the-battle-for-wesnoth-server.

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello,

Andreas Enge <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 04:32:46PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>> Sorry, I misunderstood the conclusion of the discussion: I thought that
>> we would simply follow the package naming convention as per the manual.
>
> I am confused about this statement. The naming convention speaks a bit
> vaguely of "project name chosen upstream"; very often, this means the
> tarball name. Now there is www.wesnoth.org, which distributes tarballs and
> executable files called wesnoth.*. So I would argue that the upstream
> name is "wesnoth" and would suggest to revert this change.

+1

I agree with Ricardo that prior discussion would have been necessary.  I
think it’s now clear that this case does not fall under the
“non-controversial” category that ‘HACKING’ mentions.

Thanks,
Ludo’.