[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?
|
From: |
zimoun |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:34:30 +0200 |
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 13:31, Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> wrote:
> Here is a recipe:
Thank you for the recipe.
> Ideally, we would reduce the LLVM and Mesa closure sizes as I started
> doing some weeks ago.
Why does one of the GNU flagship software depend on LLVM? And not
only on GNU toolchain?
Cheers,
simon
- Emacs closure at ~900MB?, zimoun, 2020/09/22
- Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/22
- Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?,
zimoun <=
- emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/24
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/24
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Pierre Neidhardt, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/25
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), zimoun, 2020/09/29
- Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?), Giovanni Biscuolo, 2020/09/29