Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?)

[Mark H Weaver]

Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz> writes:

> Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:
>
>> Are there additional benefits to 'emacs-lucid' that are not already
>> addressed by 'emacs-no-x-toolkit'?  I'm not necessarily opposed to
>> adding another Emacs variant, but I don't yet understand the motivation.
>
> Does EXWM run on emacs-no-x-toolkit?

I don't have time to test it now, but I guess that it does, because
<https://github.com/ch11ng/exwm/wiki#prerequisites> doesn't mention
anything requirement on which toolkit Emacs is built with.

Anyway, I have no objection to adding 'emacs-lucid' if there's interest.

      Mark