[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Preservation of Guix 2021-10-22
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Re: Preservation of Guix 2021-10-22 |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Oct 2021 09:52:59 +0200 |
Hi Timothy,
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 21:09, Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com> wrote:
> As promised, here is the updated Preservation of Guix Report:
>
> https://ngyro.com/pog-reports/2021-10-22/
Cool!
> I didn’t add the breakdowns that zimoun suggested (yet), but here is a
> bit of extra information. Of the missing fixed-output derivations, we
> have:
>
> git 376
> tar+gz 3092
> total 3468
>
> If we limit ourselves to the most recent commit (258a27e):
>
> git 217
> tar+gz 78
> total 295
How can I get the list of these 376+217 packages? Because it appears to
me easy to send a save request for them. :_)
> My guess (and that’s all it is!) is that before “sources.json”, a lot of
> tarballs slipped through the cracks. Now, most of the tarballs are
> getting archived via “sources.json”, but since the Git references are
> not, there are several that are being missed.
Yeah, probably because “guix lint” is not systematically run by
submitter or reviewer.
The Data Service is running linter [1] and one can explore the report
[2]. However, I do not remember if the ’archival’ checker is run.
1: <https://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/4a0cd6297af35a36e9f492bb234fc110d6423a4d>
2:
<https://data.guix.gnu.org/revision/4a0cd6297af35a36e9f492bb234fc110d6423a4d/lint-warnings>
Cheers,
simon
- Preservation of Guix 2021-10-22, Timothy Sample, 2021/10/22
- Re: Preservation of Guix 2021-10-22,
zimoun <=
- Re: Preservation of Guix 2021-10-22, zimoun, 2021/10/25
- Re: Preservation of Guix 2021-10-22, Timothy Sample, 2021/10/26
- Re: Preservation of Guix 2021-10-22, zimoun, 2021/10/26
- Re: Preservation of Guix 2021-10-22, Ludovic Courtès, 2021/10/29