[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Missing tags in Debbugs?
From: |
zimoun |
Subject: |
Missing tags in Debbugs? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2022 09:29:20 +0200 |
Hi,
Thanks for the feed back
On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 08:07, bokr@bokr.com wrote:
> Anyway, the idea is to make the Subject: line greppable for both
> what the bug is about and its status when it was closed.
I agree that it is hard to work with the Debbugs archive. What you are
asking seems possible with Debbugs but the GNU instance is not
supporting many tags [1]. Using the ’Subject:’ line as tagging system
could be a workaround but I am not convinced the ratio effort /
usefulness is worth because it is too error-prone, IMHO.
Arun has presented nice ideas about improving Mumi and it appears to me
the direction to go.
1: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/Developer.html#tags>
Cheers,
simon
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, (continued)
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, zimoun, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, zimoun, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, zimoun, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, bokr, 2022/06/29
- Missing tags in Debbugs?,
zimoun <=
- Re: Missing tags in Debbugs?, Bengt Richter, 2022/06/29
Re: Dealing with upstream issues, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/06/30
Re: Dealing with upstream issues, zimoun, 2022/06/27