[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Missing tags in Debbugs?
From: |
Bengt Richter |
Subject: |
Re: Missing tags in Debbugs? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:45:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On +2022-06-29 09:29:20 +0200, zimoun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the feed back
>
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2022 at 08:07, bokr@bokr.com wrote:
>
> > Anyway, the idea is to make the Subject: line greppable for both
> > what the bug is about and its status when it was closed.
>
> I agree that it is hard to work with the Debbugs archive. What you are
> asking seems possible with Debbugs but the GNU instance is not
> supporting many tags [1]. Using the ’Subject:’ line as tagging system
> could be a workaround but I am not convinced the ratio effort /
> usefulness is worth because it is too error-prone, IMHO.
>
> Arun has presented nice ideas about improving Mumi and it appears to me
> the direction to go.
>
>
> 1: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/Developer.html#tags>
Thanks, that LGTM: Looks like easy-to-parse html :)
This looks interesting too, that I just found:
2: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/server-request.html#introduction>
Will have to try it. Maybe emacs already has a mode for that?
(I need to refresh my emacs-fu ;/ )
>
>
> Cheers,
> simon
--
Regards,
Bengt Richter
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, (continued)
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, zimoun, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, Maxime Devos, 2022/06/28
- Re: Dealing with upstream issues, bokr, 2022/06/29
- Missing tags in Debbugs?, zimoun, 2022/06/29
- Re: Missing tags in Debbugs?,
Bengt Richter <=
Re: Dealing with upstream issues, Ludovic Courtès, 2022/06/30
Re: Dealing with upstream issues, zimoun, 2022/06/27