[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: modifying (rather than fully replacing) a build phases
From: |
John Kehayias |
Subject: |
Re: modifying (rather than fully replacing) a build phases |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jun 2023 15:02:46 +0000 |
Hi Csepp,
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 02:30 AM, Csepp wrote:
>
> I think I've used assoc-ref to find the build phase I wanted and then
> called it from something else. It's not super pretty, but it works.
Yes, you can get phases from other build-systems, for instance, which
is needed sometimes. Here I meant actually modifying such a phase,
rather than just using/replacing/removing it. Perhaps that is not so
straightforward currently. (And like you said, getting phases from
elsewhere can feel a little clunky, luckily not needed too often from
what I've seen.)
John