Re: [Gzz-commits] manuscripts/storm article.rst

[hemppah]

Lainaus Benja Fallenstein <address@hidden>:

> address@hidden wrote:
> > I wrote something *interesting* about current research with regard to p2p,
> as 
> > we agreed in #gzz, in overview section. I think this a worth to mention,
> since 
> > PeerNet differs from 'p2p mainstream' in 'layer'(application level <-->
> network 
> > layer), but otherwise have very similar features as other application level
> p2p 
> > systems (DHT-like routing, log n neighbors, log n routing, local knowledge
> etc).
> 
> But how is it relevant to Storm? I mean, you surely aren't saying that 
> we should include everything that is interesting, no matter whether it 
> is relevant or not? :-)

I think it's as relevant as other p2p techniques to Storm :). But I don't say 
we should include everything in p2p field; just the things which are most 
common/interesting are worth to mention in short overview section on p2p 
research field (?). And PeerNet definately belongs to latter category (?).


-Hermanni



-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/