[Gzz-commits] manuscripts/xupdf article.rst

[Benja Fallenstein]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    manuscripts
Changes by:     Benja Fallenstein <address@hidden>      03/02/15 07:28:25

Modified files:
        xupdf          : article.rst 

Log message:
        comments into comments

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst.diff?tr1=1.126&tr2=1.127&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst
diff -u manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst:1.126 manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst:1.127
--- manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst:1.126 Sat Feb 15 07:05:12 2003
+++ manuscripts/xupdf/article.rst       Sat Feb 15 07:28:25 2003
@@ -6,13 +6,13 @@
 
        \if0
 
-Issues
-======
+.. Issues
+   ======
 
-- most important: what is our central thesis / hypothesis / thing?
-  There are lots of nice technologies and ideas but we need the
-  "one idea to rule them all" ;)  ((been rereading Tolkien) ;)
-  We have:
+   - most important: what is our central thesis / hypothesis / thing?
+     There are lots of nice technologies and ideas but we need the
+     "one idea to rule them all" ;)  ((been rereading Tolkien) ;)
+     We have:
 
        - xu structure
 
@@ -32,48 +32,45 @@
 
        - user editability
 
-    **RESOLVED**: Most important is the non-disruptive f+c link structure,
-    and the visual stuff that helps understanding it. The xu structure is not
-    so novel and not so important in xupdf: the link model is actually
-    more general. As for editability, like Benja says ::
+     **RESOLVED**: Most important is the non-disruptive f+c link structure,
+     and the visual stuff that helps understanding it. The xu structure is not
+     so novel and not so important in xupdf: the link model is actually
+     more general. As for editability, like Benja says ::
 
        <benja> tuomasl: I think that's... a benefit, but not the point
        <benja> since it's too well-known
        <benja> I mean, shout 'should users be able to make links while 
browsing' into the audience and you'll get back 
        'YEEEEES!' ;-)
 
-    Spatial canvases might be nice but might be too much work.
+     Spatial canvases might be nice but might be too much work.
 
-- What to call xupdf? We need some name for the view & structure demonstrated 
here.
-  Gzz is much more than this, but xupdf is not necessarily ideal ;)
+   - What to call xupdf? We need some name for the view & structure 
demonstrated here.
+     Gzz is much more than this, but xupdf is not necessarily ideal ;)
 
-- why left-right, why not some other set of directions?
+   - why left-right, why not some other set of directions?
 
-    RESOLVED: (needs to be explained in text): 
+       RESOLVED: (needs to be explained in text): 
 
        - screen aspect, TV aspect 4:3 --> 16:9!
 
        - left and right hand
 
-- the above points only partly resolve the issue. More importantly, 
-  why should there be exactly two possible directions and not four 
-  or the full set of directions on a circle. 
-  It could be argued that more variation in the directions would 
-  yield more visual features for distinguishing between different links.
+   - the above points only partly resolve the issue. More importantly, 
+     why should there be exactly two possible directions and not four 
+     or the full set of directions on a circle. 
+     It could be argued that more variation in the directions would 
+     yield more visual features for distinguishing between different links.
 
-- Do we differentiate between different link types/directions such as
+   - Do we differentiate between different link types/directions such as
        - left-right
        - past-future
        - source-referer
        - created by document author/user?
 
 
-EXPLAIN ANIMATION! FOR US, OBVIOUS, BUT NEED SCREENSHOTS OF COMPLETE ANIMATION
-SEQUENCE BETWEEN NODES!!!
+   EXPLAIN ANIMATION! FOR US, OBVIOUS, BUT NEED SCREENSHOTS OF COMPLETE 
ANIMATION
+   SEQUENCE BETWEEN NODES!!!
 
-.. raw:: latex
-
-       \fi
 
 Abstract
 ========