[Gzz-commits] gzz/doc/pegboard/projectsplit--tjl peg.rst

[Tuomas J. Lukka]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/gzz
Module name:    gzz
Changes by:     Tuomas J. Lukka <address@hidden>        03/02/20 06:28:23

Modified files:
        doc/pegboard/projectsplit--tjl: peg.rst 

Log message:
        2 unresolved issues more

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/gzz/gzz/doc/pegboard/projectsplit--tjl/peg.rst.diff?tr1=1.7&tr2=1.8&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: gzz/doc/pegboard/projectsplit--tjl/peg.rst
diff -u gzz/doc/pegboard/projectsplit--tjl/peg.rst:1.7 
gzz/doc/pegboard/projectsplit--tjl/peg.rst:1.8
--- gzz/doc/pegboard/projectsplit--tjl/peg.rst:1.7      Thu Feb 20 06:18:40 2003
+++ gzz/doc/pegboard/projectsplit--tjl/peg.rst  Thu Feb 20 06:28:22 2003
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
 =============================================================
 
 :Author:   Tuomas J. Lukka
-:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/02/20 11:18:40 $
-:Revision: $Revision: 1.7 $
+:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/02/20 11:28:22 $
+:Revision: $Revision: 1.8 $
 :Status:   Incomplete
 
 Issues
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 
 - Should we really split the code?
 
-    SUGGESTED RESOLUTION: Yes. It will be far easier for others
+    RESOLVED: Yes. It will be far easier for others
     to use our code in smaller, easily digestible pieces.
 
     It's a psychological thing: it's just easier for outsiders
@@ -47,10 +47,15 @@
 
 - What granularity should we be splitting up with?
 
-    SUGGESTED RESOLUTION: Function and independence.
+    RESOLVED: Maturity, function and independence.
     I.e. split metacode, storm, &c, but don't split 
     opengl and awt vob stuff.
 
+    The idea is that we have the core project
+    that produces spin-off projects every once
+    in a while, as bodies of code mature and 
+    are refactored into being more independent.
+
 - Should we really have a separate XuStorm package?
 
     RESOLVED: Yes. It certainly doesn't belong in Storm: 
@@ -257,6 +262,7 @@
 - Figure out the new structure
 
 - Write the code to make use of the new structure
+