|
From: | Benja Fallenstein |
Subject: | Re: [Gzz] New PEG: email_storage--marc |
Date: | Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:39:29 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020913 Debian/1.1-1 |
Tuomas Lukka wrote:
Is it allowed to just define our own access-type like that? Or should we use a "x-..." type or ask IANA for an identifier?
I don't think x-types are allowed either, but have to check :-/ -- but it may still be a good way to mark that we're not using a registered type. I think registering means publishing an RFC, which at this point seems overkill (esp. as we're *not* sending e-mail with these access types, which is what the RFCs assume).
Additionally: are you planning to represent transclusions between messages somehow? Probably not on this level, but above this level it would be nice.
I guess I need to answer this because I don't think Marc can answer it ;-) I want to use "this is the same"-typed xu links for that: we need those anyway, e.g. because of the block publishing issue. So, we could at some point have some heuristical algorithm that takes the "In-Reply-To:" headers, gets the respective messages, takes the ">" lines from the reply (stripping the ">"), and runs an EnfiladeAligner over that data. It's going to be a bit tricky, but probably it can be quite good at finding the transclusions.
Coming up with a format for sending email bodies as enfilades is, of course, another issue entirely...
- Benja
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |