|
From: | Benja Fallenstein |
Subject: | Re: [Gzz] New PEG: email_storage--marc |
Date: | Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:52:42 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020913 Debian/1.1-1 |
Tuomas Lukka wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:39:29AM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:Tuomas Lukka wrote:Is it allowed to just define our own access-type like that? Or should we use a "x-..." type or ask IANA for an identifier?I don't think x-types are allowed either, but have to check :-/ -- but it may still be a good way to mark that we're not using a registered type. I think registering means publishing an RFC, which at this point seems overkill (esp. as we're *not* sending e-mail with these access types, which is what the RFCs assume).Still, it's important to adhere to standards - let's not pull a Microsoft.
Yes, that's true. I'll take a careful look at the standards today and report back.
Coming up with a format for sending email bodies as enfilades is, of course, another issue entirely...Yes. One that *will* need an RFC.
Hey, that's a good idea :-) So we should submit: - Storm - an enfilade serialization format for publication as RFCs... - Benja
Tuomas _______________________________________________ Gzz-dev mailing list address@hidden http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gzz-dev
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |