[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 2002 10:59:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
> >And I'd definitely label containment as an experimental feature; I hope
> >that doesn't bother you.
> >
>
> Hm, to me it is a feature that has been part of the zzstructure specs
> for a Very Long Time now, and I don't agree that containment itself is
> experimental.
There haven't been any implementations of it in real use, right?
It doesn't matter if Ted drew it in a diagram 20 years ago; if it hasn't been
used by anyone for anything, it's experimental.
> I also feel that we need containment itself now, because
> we need it for the email client.
I won't argue with that.
> I do agree that our way of implementing
> it (which includes view options and edit bindings (but not the
> containment structure)) are experimental, and I do agree that there are
> problems with the 'p' keys until we have working editing across cell
> boundaries.
Exactly. Which is why I'd prefer to have it disabled by default until most
problems have been ironed out.
> >>I dunno, I'm ok with the
> >>keys being optional for now, but I don't like your way to activate them...
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Oh, that was only a suggestion. Feel free to suggest something better.
> >
>
> Hm, if we had a real command line program to start the client, I'd say
>
> gzz --use-containment-keys
>
> is good enough... maybe for now,
>
> make run CONTAINMENT=on
>
> which would then call Gzz.py as above?
That's some difficult makefile programming you're asking for there ;)
But any of these are fine with me.
Tuomas
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, (continued)
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja,
Tuomas Lukka <=
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/30
- Experimental, was: Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/30
- [Gzz] Vertex documentation, Matti Katila, 2002/10/29
- [Gzz] Re: Vertex documentation, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- [Gzz] Re: Vertex documentation, Matti Katila, 2002/10/30