[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Oct 2002 18:27:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
> >>>Having some connections of a cell (or its clone) such that they are
> >>>visible
> >>>or not visible, depending on whether something else happened to be in
> >>>some way
> >>>or some other way is VERY counterintuitive and makes it really easy to
> >>>get
> >>>lost in the structure.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Sorry, I don't understand at all. :-(
> >>
> >>
> >
> >If you don't have the clone dimension visible, then *sometimes* an
> >operation will
> >make visible connections to the cell you're at and sometimes nothing
> >happens.
> >
>
> *If* you are viewing d.contain and d..contain-list. I think if you
> expect a user to understand d.contain and d..contain-list, you can
> expect them to understand about d.clone as well. Especially since if
> you're viewing d.contain and d..contain-list, you *see* the difference
> (that this cell already has connections on these dimensions)!
The keys work even if you don't view those dims, right?
Tuomas
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, (continued)
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/28
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/28
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja,
Tuomas Lukka <=
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/29
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/10/30
- Re: [Gzz] New PEG: containment--benja, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/10/30