[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gzz] cellview_naming
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
[Gzz] cellview_naming |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Nov 2002 11:57:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
benja wrote:
>
>``CellInBox`` is a nice interface, but not a nice name. Let's rename:
Agreed
>- ``CellInBox`` to ``CellView``
Agreed
>- ``CellView`` to ``CellBoxView``
>
>``CellContentView`` keeps its name. This makes sense because after all,
>both ``CellBoxView`` and ``CellContentView`` are just ways to view
>a cell, one with and one without a box around.
I disagree; having separate interfaces makes using CellInBoxHook a bother:
you can't then use it for either of the derived interfaces, since they
are abstract classes..
>Additionally, after this change, add all three classes to the list
>of frozen classes (or, when ``view_split--tjl`` is implemented,
>simply add ``gzz.view`` to the list of frozen packages).
Agreed.
Tuomas
- [Gzz] cellview_naming,
Tuomas Lukka <=
- Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/02
- Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/02
- Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/02
- Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/02
- Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/02
- Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming, Tuomas Lukka, 2002/11/02
- Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming, Benja Fallenstein, 2002/11/02