[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming
From: |
Tuomas Lukka |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] cellview_naming |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Nov 2002 18:09:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 04:51:15PM +0100, Benja Fallenstein wrote:
> Tuomas Lukka wrote:
>
> >>>I think that maybe taking the approach you outline above would be better
> >>>(passing parameters in constructor).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Hm. Yes, could be.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Needs its own PEG, though; but for this PEG, it's mean abolishing the
> >CellContentView
> >and CellBoxView classes.
>
> So you're suggesting to make getting rid of CellContentView and
> CellBoxView part of the PEG, but not the replacement? That sounds a bit
> strange to me ;-)
I'm suggesting that we do that for now, using CellInBox for both directly,
and PEGging the change to ViewContext (i.e. removing getView, getCellView,
getCellContentView, and getWindow)
Tuomas