|
From: | Benja Fallenstein |
Subject: | Re: Cursors in RDF (was Re: [Gzz] Structure proposal: RDF (+Xu)) |
Date: | Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:30:54 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021226 Debian/1.2.1-9 |
Benja Fallenstein wrote:
Benja Fallenstein wrote:There's a cursor position, the focused node, shown in the middle of the screen. [...] In addition to the focus, we keep a selected node. This is shown directly right of the focused note (if connected poswards) or directly left (if connected negwards).Just noted that literals make this a little more complicated. We want to be able to focus literal nodes, yet we cannot make a link to them, because they're without identity. From the semantics perspective, this makes sense, but for editing, it makes things yet a little more difficult.Have to think about this. Possibly saying "the 'age' property literal of person X is accursed" would be right, but there may be two such literals... hmmmm.
Maybe you shouldn't be able to *accurse* literals anyway, only select them on the wheel. Moving onto them doesn't make a lot of sense, since they have only one backlink by definition... And to edit a number of properties, it would be more practical to
Tab Benja Tab Down Tab Fallenstein Tab than to Right Tab Benja Tab Left Down Right Tab Fallenstein Tab Left ...However, we still need a way to select the literal as the current 'rotation' of the wheel. If we just stored the literal itself, it would be possible that there are two different properties on an object with an equal literal value... so we'd probably need to store the property as well...
-b.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |