gzz-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gzz] Re: What is our Wiki for? (WAS: reST/Docutils Wiki and Navidoc


From: Benja Fallenstein
Subject: Re: [Gzz] Re: What is our Wiki for? (WAS: reST/Docutils Wiki and Navidoc)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 14:15:32 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030714 Debian/1.4-2

Hermanni Hyytiälä wrote:
Why would wiki make a good starting point?

1) Information categorization
We could categorize things under different categories with links (e.g.,
"Tutorials", "Terms", "Best practices", "Documentation",
"Tutorials/Fenfire project", "Tutorials/Subprojects", "Best
Practices/LibVob", "Best Practices/Design Patterns" "Best
Practices/Avoid these things", "Terms/Xanalogical model", "Terms/3D
programming" &c).
...
I'd think we should use .rst for those things.

If .rst files can do categorization then it should be fine ;).

Of course we can already use hierarchy, but we could also extend rst a little to make categorization more flexible. Suggestion: Add a header to rst pages::

    =====
    Title
    =====

    :Author: ...
    :Created: ...
    :Categories: Tutorials -> Fenfire project; Terms -> RDF

Then, in the output the categories would be hyperlinked, and there would be auto-generated summary pages; a bit like in Tim Bray's ongoing_, where articles can also be in multiple categories (example_).

.. _ongoing: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/
.. _example: http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2003/07/28/SummerPix

I think it would be cool if it were possible to categorize everything that way, including PEGs, darts, and design documents...

- Benja





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]