[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Health-dev] GNU Health on MS Windows?
From: |
Axel Braun |
Subject: |
Re: [Health-dev] GNU Health on MS Windows? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.11.10-17-desktop; KDE/4.14.1; x86_64; ; ) |
Hi Jakob,
Am Donnerstag, 18. September 2014, 19:46:57 schrieb Jakob Lang:
> Axel, you said "...for good reasons..." can you give me some more details
> on that? Or was that just a general dislike of a Linuxer against Windows?
> If there are really good arguments I might be able to convince the team
> here to go for a Linux.
This is really off-topic in the list, and I dont want to start a discussion
like 'my one is longer than your one'. Everybody should use what he is used
to/likes most/serves the needs best/etc.
But to answer your question: Performance, Security, Flexibility, ...where do
you want to start?
Lets start with the most important one: freedom. 'Free' not necessarily as in
'free beer', but as in 'free speech'.
I have transparency and control over my system. I can decide to run it as
server w/o GUI, with a lean GUI or with a choice full-blown GUIs. Ergonomic
GUI with some options to adapt, not a scrappy surface like W7 or W8
Nearly everything I need comes out of the box, and if not, I have a wide
variety of software I can add (from the standard repsitories.) And if
something is not there, I have the option to build it for my system (even if
you are - like me - not a programmer. Or not anymore). In that way, redir made
it to openSUSE standard....
Nobody tells me that I can only connect 5 Users to my machine (otherwise I
have to buy a higher = more expensive license).
I can decide when I upgrade, not the supplier (BTW, is there a central packet
management for Windows? I dont think so...), and while one security upgrade on
Windows is running I have already installed 10 Linux-Boxes from scratch (no
idea why this takes ages.....before it rolls back. In some cases)
I currently work for a large company, and have a Windows-Desktop. From that
experience, I feel that Outlook, Sharepoint & Co. are highly overrated. W7 is
not handy. Even worse the server applications running on a Windows-Box with
SQL Server. There is hardly one that has no performance problems (probably not
only a problem of the OS, but of the application as well).
Enough words, I dont want to bore the list, I think everybody can add aspects
to it. If you feel you need more info or discussion, send me a PM
Cheers/Axel
- [Health-dev] GNU Health on MS Windows?, Jakob Lang, 2014/09/18
- Re: [Health-dev] GNU Health on MS Windows?, Ivo Ulrich, 2014/09/18
- Re: [Health-dev] GNU Health on MS Windows?, Jakob Lang, 2014/09/18
- Re: [Health-dev] GNU Health on MS Windows?, Cédric Krier, 2014/09/18
- Re: [Health-dev] GNU Health on MS Windows?, Ivo Ulrich, 2014/09/18
- Re: [Health-dev] GNU Health on MS Windows?, Axel Braun, 2014/09/18
- Re: [Health-dev] GNU Health on MS Windows?, Jakob Lang, 2014/09/18
- Re: [Health-dev] GNU Health on MS Windows?,
Axel Braun <=
- Re: [Health-dev] GNU Health on MS Windows?, Mathias Behrle, 2014/09/19