Re: [Health-dev] Access right for gnuhealth.patient.cage

[Cédric Krier]

On 2015-12-11 09:30, Luis Falcon wrote:
> > 
> > I don't agree to remove access rights from the base. I think if they
> > are well define they will match most of the needs. It is done like
> > that in Tryton. If for a local installation, someone need some access
> > right tuning, he still can by adding new records (that's why a
> > default access right is needed).
> > 
> Then might as well we leave it the way it is, and we can de-activate
> the demo users.

I think you did not understand me.
I think it is good to have default access rights with pre defined group
(people are free to use such groups or not) but it is not good to have
predefined users as you can not change the password or anything else.

For the cage model, the problem is to define what is the default access
right (for user without any group) and is there other group that should
have more access rights than the default.

-- 
Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL
Email/Jabber: address@hidden
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/

pgpKfA4wRl_M2.pgp
Description: PGP signature