Re: [Health-dev] Access right for gnuhealth.patient.cage

[Luis Falcon]

Hi there !
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 22:31:23 +0700
Cédric Krier <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 2015-12-11 09:30, Luis Falcon wrote:
> > > 
> > > I don't agree to remove access rights from the base. I think if
> > > they are well define they will match most of the needs. It is
> > > done like that in Tryton. If for a local installation, someone
> > > need some access right tuning, he still can by adding new records
> > > (that's why a default access right is needed).
> > >   
> > Then might as well we leave it the way it is, and we can de-activate
> > the demo users.  
> 
> I think you did not understand me.
> I think it is good to have default access rights with pre defined
> group (people are free to use such groups or not) but it is not good
> to have predefined users as you can not change the password or
> anything else.
Yes. That's why I'm proposing leaving the definition of the access
groups, and removing / deactivating the demo users.
> 
> For the cage model, the problem is to define what is the default
> access right (for user without any group) and is there other group
> that should have more access rights than the default.
> 
OK.

pgpBGWIS9UTqQ.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature