|
From: | Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto |
Subject: | Re: [Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required |
Date: | Sun, 13 Dec 2015 09:22:23 -0500 |
Dear comunity2015-12-13 8:20 GMT-05:00 Marc Murray <address@hidden>:Dear Luis,
On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 12:23 +0000, Luis Falcon wrote:
Let's not confuse the physical sex with legal or gender. This issue has been brought up several times already, and I will change the term "sex" for "gender" in the person (party) model.
On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 08:55 +0000, Cédric Krier wrote:
The boolean proposal is semantically the same as mine to add a new optionAnd I agree with what Cedric said here.
"Unknown" except that my solution doesn't add an extra field which should be
tested all over the code before using the sex field.
--
Marc
[1] http://www.amamanualofstyle.com/view/10.1093/jama/9780195176339.001.0001/med-9780195176339-div2-350
--Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto
Senior Software Analyst DeveloperClaro RPC +51983265994 | MOV RPM( # ) +51 966110066GNULinux RU #379182 | GNULinux RM #277661No availability between 08:30 and 18:00, I will answer as soon as posiblePlease consider the environment before printing this emailJoin the campaign at http://thinkBeforePrinting.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |