health-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required


From: Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto
Subject: Re: [Health-dev] [bug #46665] sex should not be required
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 09:22:23 -0500

Dear Comunity,

I am adding the same comment on my last mail, since it wasnt correctly verified for my spelling

2015-12-13 9:19 GMT-05:00 Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto <address@hidden>:
Dear comunity

2015-12-13 8:20 GMT-05:00 Marc Murray <address@hidden>:
Dear Luis,

On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 12:23 +0000, Luis Falcon wrote:

Let's not confuse the physical sex with legal or gender. This
issue has been brought up several times already, and I will change the
term "sex" for "gender" in the person (party) model.

​Before doing an answer I have asked to two health professional about the sex and told me that, for medical reason is strongly important, no sexual choice, physical sex is strongly important, since the physical sexuality is important information for managed health, if the patient will be a part of a surgery, physical sex is really strongly important, is no the same manage drugs to a male or female body. If the health would be related to any kind of business ( no health and body ), sex wouldn't be important. Finally, a person who change his sex, also must provide this information for historical, since it must be considered for health professionals.

I hope do my small contribution to the thread

 
 

On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 08:55 +0000, Cédric Krier wrote:
The boolean proposal is semantically the same as mine to add a new option
"Unknown" except that my solution doesn't add an extra field which should be
tested all over the code before using the sex field.
And I agree with what Cedric said here.


--
Marc

[1] http://www.amamanualofstyle.com/view/10.1093/jama/9780195176339.001.0001/med-9780195176339-div2-350




--
Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto
    Senior Software Analyst Developer
    Claro RPC +51983265994 | MOV RPM( # ) +51 966110066
    GTalk: address@hidden | Skype: csotelop
    GNULinux RU #379182 | GNULinux RM #277661

No availability between 08:30 and 18:00, I will answer as soon as posible

Please consider the environment before printing this email
Join the campaign at http://thinkBeforePrinting.org



--
Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto
    Senior Software Analyst Developer
    Claro RPC +51983265994 | MOV RPM( # ) +51 966110066
    GTalk: address@hidden | Skype: csotelop
    GNULinux RU #379182 | GNULinux RM #277661

No availability between 08:30 and 18:00, I will answer as soon as posible

Please consider the environment before printing this email
Join the campaign at http://thinkBeforePrinting.org

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]