[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail

From: Bas van der Vlies
Subject: Re: [Cfengine] Re: cfexecd mail
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 14:12:19 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624

address@hidden wrote:

As long as it's rational and nothing breaks, by all means.


On 30 Jul, Andrew Stribblehill wrote:

Quoting Bas van der Vlies <address@hidden> (2003-07-30 11:06:05 BST):

Andrew Stribblehill wrote:

Quoting Bas van der Vlies <address@hidden> (2003-07-30 10:34:53 BST):

Should we not use the same syntax for turning on/off actions
cfagent -z sysadm, smptfrom, ....

It is easier to understand which variables we ask and we get back.
For me it make sense and there is a mechanism to query the cfagent

Yes, that's nicer, I agree. Currently we use ':' as the standard
separator don't we? So would 'cfagent -z foo:bar:baz -z quux -zbongo'
be okay (as a bizarre way) to ask for foo, bar, baz, quux and bongo?

No the separator is ','. From the docs cfagent -j copy,tidy ;-)
cfagent -x boo,bar,baz -z quux -zbongo is one bizarre way to ask
for some variables.

Yes, you're right. Even the code agrees with you ;) So Mark, want me
to code this?

It is fine for me and the syntax is also clear. In the meanwhile i
use my patch that fixes the smtpfrom line and wait for the new
cfagent -z. Andrew if you need help with programming or testing.
Do not hesitate to ask!

*                                                                  *
*  Bas van der Vlies                     e-mail: address@hidden      *
*  SARA - Academic Computing Services    phone:  +31 20 592 8012   *
*  Kruislaan 415                         fax:    +31 20 6683167    *
*  1098 SJ Amsterdam                                               *
*                                                                  *

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]