Re: cfrun: question about the output for unreachable hosts

[rader]

 > > No route to host =3D firewall?

 > No. The hosts in question are simply not running, but on the same
 > subnet. That's OK though, because they're workstations whose users are
 > not in today.
 > 
 > But that's not the point. The point is that cfrun prints
 > 
 > > > cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: Couldn't open a socket
 > > > cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de: socket: No route to host
 > 
 > three times although the hosts ls-bs-ws3.bs.linet-services.de,
 > ls-bs-ws7.bs.linet-services.de and ls-bs-ws8.bs.linet-services.de are
 > the ones that aren't reachable. The output above is
 > useless. ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de is up and reachable, tested with
 > "cfrun ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de" (in fact, it is the host on which
 > I run "cfrun").

I think "cfrun:ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de" means "cfrun running
on ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de".  So the error above means
"cfrun running on ls-bs-si2.bs.linet-services.de couldn't open a
socket [to the host it's hailing]"

Try setting OutputPrefix = ( ":" )

steve 
- - - 
systems & network manager
high energy physics
university of wisconsin