Re: [help-gengetopt] mutually exclusive group of options

[Andre Noll]

On 14:46, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:

> A situation like the one you describes implicitly requires mutually 
> exclusive groups (not groups of mutually exclusive options), i.e., the 
> program accepts two different (or more than two) mutually exclusive 
> syntaxes (besides a possibly common options).  And probably the best 
> thing would be to add such features.

Yes, that would be _very_ useful. There are many programs that have
"general" options such as --verbose as well as "subcommand" options
(like Papp Gyozo's --init, --attach), each of which requires its own
set of options.

Regards
Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature